Sunday, March 3, 2013

Sermon for Third Sunday in Lent, Oculi



Lent 3
                                                                                                            Ex. 8:16-24
                                                                                                            3/3/13

            When I was growing up in Indiana, one of the places I really enjoyed visiting was Conner Prairie.  Conner Prairie is located in Fishers, IN, just northwest of Indianapolis.  It is a reconstruction of a settlement as it would have looked in Indiana in 1836.
            As you walk in to the settlement area, there is a sign that says, “You are entering 1836.”  All the buildings fit that time period. There are residents in the settlement who are all dressed in period clothing and all are carrying out activities that were part of everyday life in that year.  They are all “in character.”  They always ask visitors about who the president is right now.  And when the person says “Barak Obama” the Conner Prairie resident will say that, no, it is Andrew Jackson.
            Everything in Conner Prairie is set in 1836.  And every time I visited, one thing always grossed me out – it made me glad that I lived in the modern era.  There was a house where a woman would always be baking and cooking.  It was fascinating to see her using her wood burning oven in order to make things, and it did smell good.
            However… surrounding the baked bread or soup that she had made were flies. And not just a few flies – there were a lot of flies, swarming all around.  They crawled all over the food. As the woman talked she would periodically wave her hand over the food and make them take off.  But they would just swarm right back. They flew around the food.  They flew around the people.  It was just nasty.
            Every time I hear our Old Testament lesson, those experiences at Conner Prairie always come to mind.  We hear in our text this morning the third and fourth plagues that God sent upon Egypt as he worked to prompt Pharaoh to allow the Israelites to leave. Ultimately this is a contest between the true God and false gods. As we see God working to free his people, we are reminded that God has freed us in Christ.  And at the same time the challenge of false gods continues for us each day.
            When the book of Genesis ends Joseph is second in charge over all of Egypt.  His father Jacob and all of his extended family have come down to Egypt and have been settled in one part of Egypt, Goshen.  This was somewhere in the time period of about 1800 years before Christ.  It was the time of the Middle kingdom in Egypt and things were good.
            However, if you fast forward about one hundred and fifty years things have changed.  Around 1650 B.C. a rather mysterious group called the Hyksos – sometimes also called “the Sea People” – came into Egypt from the north.  The Middle kingdom had already come to an end and Egypt was in a period of weakness. The Hyksos took advantage of this and they ended up ruling Egypt for about one hundred years. 
            And then, around 1540 BC the Egyptians finally drove out the Hyksos and Egypt re-emerged as a strong power.  It emerged as a strong power – but as a power that had just had a century long bad experience with a foreign people in their midst.  They looked around and realized that there was another foreign people in their midst – the Israelites.  By around 1400 B.C.the Israelites had been in Egypt for four hundred years. And God had blessed them.  We hear at the beginning of Exodus, “But the people of Israel were fruitful and increased greatly; they multiplied and grew exceedingly strong, so that the land was filled with them.”
            This background helps us to understand what we find in Exodus chapter one.  There we read: “Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who did not know Joseph. And he said to his people, ‘Behold, the people of Israel are too many and too mighty for us. Come, let us deal shrewdly with them, lest they multiply, and, if war breaks out, they join our enemies and fight against us and escape from the land.’”  You know what happened.  The Egyptians enslaved the Israelites and used them as forced labor.
            The end of Exodus chapter two says, “During those many days the king of Egypt died, and the people of Israel groaned because of their slavery and cried out for help. Their cry for rescue from slavery came up to God. And God heard their groaning, and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob. God saw the people of Israel—and God knew.”
            God knew. And the time had arrived for God to act.  He called Moses as his servant through an encounter at Mt. Sinai in which a bush was burning but as not consumed by the fire.  God announced to Moses, “I have surely seen the affliction of my people who are in Egypt and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters. I know their sufferings, and I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians and to bring them up out of that land to a good and broad land, a land flowing with milk and honey.”
            God gave Moses powerful signs such as the ability to turn his staff into a snake and then back into a staff. And he sent Moses to Pharaoh with a message. He told Moses, “Then you shall say to Pharaoh, ‘Thus says the LORD, Israel is my firstborn son, and I say to you, “Let my son go that he may serve me.” If you refuse to let him go, behold, I will kill your firstborn son.’”
            Moses and his brother Aaron went before Pharaoh.  The Egyptian leader challenged them to prove themselves with a miracle. Aaron threw down the staff and it became a snake.  So Pharaoh summoned his sorcerers – his magicians – and they did the same thing. And Pharaoh hardened his heart when he saw it.
            God then turned the water of the Nile into blood through Moses and Aaron.  But the magicians of Egypt came and did this as well.  And Pharaoh remained hardened in his heart.  Next God had Moses and Aaron bring frogs upon the land of Egypt.  But the magicians of Egypt came and did this as well.  And when God relented with the frogs, Pharaoh hardened his heart.
            Then in our text, God used Moses and Aaron to send gnats upon the land.  Once again the magicians of Egypt stepped forward to duplicate the feat.  But we hear in our text, “The magicians tried by their secret arts to produce gnats, but they could not. So there were gnats on man and beast. Then the magicians said to Pharaoh, ‘This is the finger of God.’”  Despite their statement, Pharaoh's heart was hardened and he would not listen to them. And then God used Moses and Aaron to send flies upon the land of Egypt – except for Goshen were the Israelites lived.  The magicians had already been defeated – this time they didn’t try to reproduce the miracle.  And when it was done, Pharaoh again hardened his heart.
            Our text today describes the contest between the true God and the false gods of Egypt.  That’s what the ten plagues are all about.  It’s important to understand that in the ancient world in general, the gods, the leaders and nations went hand in hand. Wars between leaders and their nations were really contests between the gods of those leaders and nations.  If you won, your gods were stronger. If you lost … well maybe you needed get in line with the gods of the other side.
            Egypt and their gods hold Israel in bondage.  Moses and Aaron are dealing with Pharaoh who is himself considered to be a god.  Yahweh, the true God, the God of Israel calls Israel his son and tells Pharaoh the false god to let Israel go.  Pharaoh refuses. What is more even after his magicians can’t duplicate the miracle and announce to him “This is the finger of God,” he continues to become more hardened in his opposition to God.
            And so finally God defeats Pharaoh.  He kills the firstborn son in all of Egypt – including Pharaoh’s – in the Passover.  Pharaoh sends Israel away, until later he reconsiders and pursues Israel into the Red Sea where God drowns hard hearted Pharaoh and all of his host.  Yahweh shows that he is the true God as he redeems Israel – as he frees them from slavery.
            Our text reminds us this morning that God has redeemed us.  He has freed us from slavery – slavery to sin, death and the devil.  He did it by sending his Son into the world.  Jesus Christ came to bring the reign of God – the power of God that was turning back those evils as he freed people and creation. 
            In our Gospel lesson Jesus has been doing just that.  He has cast out a demon. And when challenged about this – when he has been accused of being in league with the devil, our Lord says: “But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.” The most powerful action of this reign occurred when Jesus died on the cross and rose from the dead in order to forgive our sins.
            Now, we have been freed.  But the struggle is not done.  Lent is a time when we emphasize this fact. The devil is still that roaring lion prowling around, seeking someone to devour.  He still uses false gods as he seeks to re-enslave us.  These are not the false gods of Egypt like Ra and Pharaoh.  Instead they are the gods that are a perfect fit for our own time. They are the gods of intelligence, choice, and pleasure; the gods of wealth, entertainment and career; the gods of popularity, acceptance and prestige.  In various forms these are the things that guide our decisions.  These are the things we value most.  And in the quest for these things there is always the temptation to harden our heart.  There is the temptation step by step to embrace and conform ourselves to these things as we reject God and his claim upon us as his redeemed people.
            The season of Lent calls us to examine our own lives and honestly assess where and how these forces are at work. It calls us to repent – to confess where we have embraced the false gods of our world and culture.  But it does this in the confidence that in the death and resurrection of Christ the kingdom of God has arrived.  It does this in the knowledge that through water and the Word of Holy Baptism we have been forgiven; we have been set free.  It does this in the expectation that the kingdom will come in all of its glory on the Last Day – and that the false gods will be destroyed forever.
 
           
  



           




Persectued Church: Letter from wife of Saeed Abedini, Christian imprisoned in Iran

Saeed Abedini is a Christian and an American citizen who has been sentenced to eight years in Iran's notorious Evin prison because of his faith in Jesus Christ.  The following is a letter from his wife, Naghmeh, describing his situation.  We are praying for Saeed in the Prayer of the Church each Sunday at Good Shepherd.

http://aclj.org/iran/wife-perspective-nightmare-husband-father-imprisoned-iran?fb_action_ids=4905029896003&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map={%224905029896003%22%3A510329739005183}&action_type_map={%224905029896003%22%3A%22og.likes%22}&action_ref_map=[]


Saturday, March 2, 2013

Mark's thoughts: "Homosexual marriage": How we got here and what it means

"Homosexual marriage": How we got here and what it means

Marriage exists in order to create, raise and nurture children.  This point should be obvious to Christians.  Immediately after creating humanity as male and female (Gen 1:26) the very next words of God are, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it” (1:27).  The institution of marriage in Genesis 2 established that the sexual union of man and woman is central and constitutive of marriage itself:  “Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24).  And as Gen 1:27 has just established, this sexual union is for the purpose of being fruitful and multiplying. The married couple that experiences the sorrow of infertility is the exception that demonstrates the truth of Genesis’ statements. 

However, you don’t have to be a Christian who has Scripture in order to understand this.  Because Genesis 1-2 describe how God has ordered his creation, people of all times and places have recognized that marriage is about producing children so that a society can continue.  They have understood that it takes a man and a woman to produce a child and that the setting of a husband and wife is then the location where that child is best nurtured and raised to be a new and productive member of society.  This basic understanding has been the case no matter whether monogamy or polygamy has been considered an acceptable form of marriage.

Because of the central and essential role that marriage plays in the production of children and the continuation of a healthy society, every culture has developed rules that define, protect and regulate marriage.  For this very reason where cultures have developed formal government structures, the government has taken on the role of administrating marriage (legally recognizing couples as being joined together in an exclusive union through a marriage license).  Government doesn’t involve itself in marriage because it created marriage.  Instead it recognizes that marriage is an institution that is a fundamental part of human existence and that it is essential to the health of society.

Marriage, sex and children have provided the foundation of human society since God created Adam and Eve. However, since the end of the twentieth century we have lived in the first time in human history when people have had the technology to separate sex and children.  Contraception – the revolution of “the pill” – has allowed people for the first time to use sex as an end itself.  They have been able to use sex solely for the purpose of physical and emotional pleasure and enjoyment.

When sex became disengaged from having children, it inevitably became disengaged from marriage as well, since marriage existed for the purpose of creating and raising children.  Once marriage was disengaged from the creation and raising of children, it took on a new purpose: adult personal fulfillment.  The inevitable result of this was the “no fault divorce.”  With children removed from the center of marriage’s purpose, now if adults were not experiencing the personal fulfillment in marriage they desired they simply ended marriage in divorce and sought a new marriage.  It did not matter that study after study have shown that divorce is a positive for adults but detrimental to children, because marriage was no longer about children.

The course of this development since the 1960’s set the stage for today’s effort to redefine marriage to include homosexual couples.  Since marriage is not about producing and raising children and is about adult personal fulfillment, there is no reason that “marriage” can’t include couples who are of the same sex. Yet along the way, something interesting happened.  Homosexual couples began to decide that children were a part of the equation that provided personal fulfillment.  By definition their union could not produce children.  But just as they had a right to marriage for the sake of personal fulfillment, so also they had a right to children for the same reason (see the fascinating response to this position by homosexuals in France: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2013/01/7601/).

We live in a society today where the institution of marriage is in grave trouble.  Cohabitation and children being raised in single parent homes continues to rise. And while society wants to convince itself that there can be “many forms of family,” one cannot undo God’s ordering of creation.  Again and again, research shows that the intact family that includes a father and mother produces the best health for society as a whole (http://surburg.blogspot.com/2013/02/intact-families-leading-factor-reducing.html). 

“Homosexual marriage” is the final development of this process.  It may not be the last “definition” of marriage that we see – “polyamorous marriage” is another logical development of marriage based on emotional ties and adult personal fulfillment.  However it is the moment when marriage becomes meaningless.  When marriage is possible between two people who by their very nature are incapable of creating children, marriage as it has existed for the entire length of human history becomes pointless.  Over time this reality will make itself felt as marriage ceases to be a priority for more and more people.  It is the final step that demonstrates marriage is about nothing other than adult personal fulfillment.  And if an emotional bond between two adults is all that is needed for personal fulfillment, why does a person want to involve the government in this at all?  Why take on the legal ramifications?  This is where we are headed.  Unfortunately for our society, this does not change God’s ordering of creation and it guarantees pain, sorrow and dysfunction.

Friday, March 1, 2013

Culture news: Gay rights bill in California seeks to strip tax exempt status from Boy Scouts

You can't get much more "God and country" than the Boy Scouts.  So when a California gay rights bill seeks to strip their tax exempt status, the first reaction is probably, "Well, it's California after all."  This is true and I don't know if the bill goes anywhere - even in California.  But the news item also illustrates the obvious pressure point where churches will be vulnerable in the future.  The first step is homosexual marriage. Then the "hate speech" and anti-discrimination legislation follow that threaten to strip churches of tax exempt status.  It will probably begin in California....

Such may be the price the Church in America must be willing to pay.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/feb/26/calif-gay-rights-bill-strips-boy-scouts-tax-exempt/

Thanks to for George Naylor for finding this.

Mark's thoughts: The Book of Concord’s catholic perspective on worship


From time to time it is always helpful to return to these words of the Book of Concord that describe what Lutheran worship looks like and the attitude with which it is done.  What happens when churches no longer gladly keep the old traditions set up in church because they are useful and promote tranquility? Order and harmony are lost.  Offense is given.  The faith confessed by the Lutherans of the Book of Concord is not taught and something else begins to take its place. 
 
Good order, harmony and avoiding offense
Concerning church regulations made by human beings, it is taught to keep those that may be kept without sin and that serve to maintain peace and good order in the church, such as specific celebrations, festivals, etc.  However, people are also instructed not to burden consciences with them as if such things were necessary for salvation. Moreover, it is taught that all rules and traditions made by human beings for the purpose of appeasing God and of earning grace are contrary to the gospel and the teaching concerning faith in Christ (AC XV.1-2).

We gladly keep the old traditions set up in the church because they are useful and promote tranquility, and we interpret them in an evangelical way, excluding the opinion which holds that they justify.  Our enemies falsely accuse us of abolishing good ordinances and church discipline.  We can truthfully claim that in our churches the public liturgy is more decent than theirs, and if you look at it correctly we are more faithful to the canons than our opponents are (Apology XV.38).

Nevertheless, we teach that liberty in these matters should be exercised moderately, so that the inexperienced may not take offense and, on account of an abuse of liberty, become more hostile to the true teaching of the gospel. Nothing in the customary rites may be changed without good reason.  Instead, in order to foster harmony, those ancient customs should be observed that can be observed without sin or without proving to be a great burden. (Apology XV.51).

This is a simple rule for interpreting traditions. We should know that they are not required acts of worship, and yet we should observe them in their place and without superstition in order to avoid offense.  This is the way many great and learned men in the church have felt about it (Apology XXVIII. 17-18).

Teaching the faith
But as the different length of day and night doe s not harm the unity of the church, so we believe that the true unity of the church is not harmed by differences in rites instituted by men, although we like it when universal rites are observed for the sake of tranquility.  So in our churches we willingly observe the order of the Mass, the Lord’s day, and the other more important feast days.  With a very thankful spirit we cherish the useful and ancient ordinances, especially when they contain a discipline that serves to educate and instruct the people and the inexperienced (Apology VII/VIII.33-34).

For after all, all ceremonies should serve the purpose of teaching the people what they need to know about Christ. (AC XXIV.3).

Ceremonies should be observed both so that people may learn the Scriptures and so that, admonished by the Word, they might experience faith and fear and finally even pray. For these are the purposes of the ceremonies. (Apology XXIV.3).

The confessors’ practice
Among us the Mass is celebrated every Lord’s day and on other festivals, when the sacrament is made available to those who wish to partake of it, after they have been examined and absolved. We also keep traditional liturgical forms, such as the order of readings, prayers, vestments, and other similar things. (Apology XXIV.1)

Moreover, no noticeable changes have been made in the public celebration of the Mass, except that in certain places German hymns are sung alongside the Latin responses for the instruction and exercise of the people. (AC XXIV.3)









Culture news: Canada Supreme Court labels language opposed to homosexuality "hate speech"

When homosexuality and homosexual marriage are cast as "civil rights" issues, the inevitable result in our current cultural setting is that any language that rejects and condemns it as sinful will be classified as "hate speech."  A recent decision in Canada continues this trend that has already been seen in Europe.  As homosexual marriage legislation is being debated in my own state of Illinois, we are told that religious conscience will not be suppressed.  However, what the government "gives" it can also take away with one court ruling by the highest court in the land.

 http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/supreme-court-muzzles-free-speech-in-canada-crushes-born-again-christian-ac?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=7be8256dcb-LifeSiteNews_com_US_Headlines_02_28_2013&utm_medium=email

Church news: A Lutheran theologian pays fitting tribute to Benedict

In a recent post I wrote:

"Like everyone else, I was shocked to hear that Pope Benedict XVI would be stepping down from his office as pope.   Benedict is a tremendous scholar and I have learned much from his books such as The Feast of Faith, A New Song for the Lord, The Spirit of the Liturgy, Jesus of Nazareth.  It has been said that Benedict has a better understanding of Lutheranism than many theologians who claim to belong to that confession today.  Naturally the differences that exist between and the Lutheran and Roman Catholic confessions remain, and those should not be minimized. Benedict certainly hasn’t"
(http://surburg.blogspot.com/2013/02/homoheresy-in-roman-catholic-church.html).

Those last two sentences were written out of deep respect.  In a post-modern world where we are told that there is no such thing as "truth," all that I can ask of a theologian is that he actually believes and confesses what his church teaches.  Benedict does.  As the years pass I find myself ever more pained by the divisions that exist within Christianity.  Yet I have also come to see that where Christians are honest about the divisions and acknowledge them the Church is healthier.  People can only speak in terms of truth and error in theology where they believe that God has provided authoritative revelation - a Word that divides truth and error.  Benedict does. In the following post Dr. John Stephenson writes, "A deep divide now exists among the theologians of all Western confessions between those who profess the truth of revelation and those who do not. If Joseph Ratzinger is not the 'dean' of the worldwide guild of theologians who belong in the first camp, I don’t know who else could be nominated for the honorific position."  I could not agree more.  Dr. Stephenson's brief piece is a beautifully written and thoughtful tribute to a remarkable Christian and theologian.

http://www.canadianlutheran.ca/thoughts-on-the-retirement-of-the-professor-pope/