When I accepted a call to Good Shepherd Lutheran Church
in Marion, Illinois, I knew that I was moving to southern Illinois. What I did not understand at the time, was
that for all intents and purposes I was moving into the “Bible belt.” If you drive about an hour northwest of
Marion you encounter the leading edge of territory that is heavily Lutheran and
Roman Catholic. But here in Marion, and as you continue south, Lutherans and
Roman Catholics are a foreign entity.
Instead, this is the home of Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals and
non-denominational churches that are largely Baptist in theology.
The move from inner suburban Chicago was quite a culture
shock. My wife encountered this in a very
striking manner. When she took our small
twin children to play with other children, she visited with the moms. They were all Christian, yet soon she
reported something odd. They asked
questions about when a person had been born again or become a Christian. Of crucial importance for them was the need
to give their “testimony.” They seemed
to feel the need to return again and again to the story about their “conversion
experience.” It could not be spoken and
heard too many times.
When I received my first call to an area that had a large
Roman Catholic population, I read the Catechism
of the Catholic Church so that I could understand what they believed as I
interacted with them. I turned now to do
the same thing as I sought to understand the Arminian, Zwinglian, Calvinistic
and Pentecostal underpinnings of the beliefs I was encountering.
As I read, it dawned on me that having rejected the
sacraments as the means by which God creates and sustains faith, this belief system
had substituted the testimony recounting conversion. Deprived of the certainty provided by God’s
action in Holy Baptism, they had created a “faux sacrament” – the recounting of
the conversion experience again and again was a means to affirm that it really had
happened, that their faith was real and that they were really Christians.
It was therefore with great interest that I read this piece by G. Shane Morris. An evangelical
who has come to believe in infant baptism, he describes how the “sacrament of
conversion” functions in the evangelical belief system as a replacement for the
Sacrament of Holy Baptism. Thanks to
Gene Veith for calling attention to it.
The "sacrament of conversion" is a replacement for the sacraments instituted by Christ. This move is prompted by the rejection of the sacraments as means by which God actually creates and sustains faith, and gives forgiveness. The cause for this is a hermeneutic that has been established upon a Platonic dualistic worldview.
The "sacrament of conversion" is a replacement for the sacraments instituted by Christ. This move is prompted by the rejection of the sacraments as means by which God actually creates and sustains faith, and gives forgiveness. The cause for this is a hermeneutic that has been established upon a Platonic dualistic worldview.
Rev. Surburg:
ReplyDeleteExcellent description of yours (“sacrament of conversion”) of the common practice of some and many professing Christians who end up making "a god" out of their "personal testimony."
I'm reminded of a past online topical message of mine that is relevant to your spot-on blog article, above:
“How to” (step by step) formula driven, prescription Christianity
http://www.thechristianmessage.org/2011/03/how-to-step-by-step-formula-driven.html
Question: If someone has a testimony, never been water baptized, heard Christ died on the cross and His finished work, shed blood and punishment paid for their sins. That person knowing they deserved everlasting punishment, but by Faith believed in Christ's atonement, will that person go to Heaven (Salvation, Justification).
ReplyDelete