Accuracy about
abortion statistics: putting things into perspective
In a recent post entitled “What is abortion?: These pictures
help us to understand what we are talking about” (http://surburg.blogspot.com/2013/03/what-is-abortion-these-pictures-help-us.html)
I was seeking to call attention to the pictures released in Grand Jury Report
for the Gosnell murder trial and the way they help us to understand what abortion
really is. There is need for calm
reflection upon this evidence and what it says about abortion. This is something that both pro-abortion and
pro-life individuals need to engage.
In the second paragraph of that post I wrote, “Some will say
that late abortions like this are the exception. However, remember that third
trimester abortions account for ten percent of the abortions done in the United States
each year. This means that some 100,000 babies like this are killed every
year.” A friend has contacted me and
pointed out that this figure is not accurate.
We certainly want to use accurate data when we talk about such an
important topic, so I went back to check and found out that he is correct. The
ten percent figure is actually the total for second and third trimester
abortions combined.
It turns out that there is always some uncertainty about
abortion statistics because there is probably a tendency to under report them:
After looking through the statistics in a number of sources
it seems that as a general rule approximately 90% of abortions are performed in
the first trimester; 9% in the second trimester; and 1% in the third
trimester. These are not exact
percentages, but when talking about the issue they provide a good working
overview to keep in mind in an area where precise statistics are not readily
available.
If we assume that around 1.2 million abortions are performed
in the United States
(http://www.guttmacher.org/media/presskits/abortion-US/statsandfacts.html)
and even grant that slightly less than 1% of all abortions are performed in the
third trimester, we still find that at least 9,000 babies are killed this way
every year.
To put this in perspective, during the Iraq war between 2003 and 2012, the U.S. armed forces in Iraq suffered 4,488 deaths from all
causes (http://www.defense.gov/news/casualty.pdf). So in any given year twice as many third
trimester babies are killed as there were U.S.
soldiers killed in the entire Iraq
war. During the ten year of U.S. involvement in Iraq, some 90,000 third
trimester babies like those pictured in the Grand Jury Report for the Gosnell
murder trial were killed.
Naturally the timing in the death of any of the 1.2 million
babies killed each year by abortion is irrelevant. The killing of a baby is the killing of a
baby. But when you hear that third trimester
abortions are rare, keep in mind that in any given year there are approximately
twice as many babies killed in this way as there were U.S. soldiers killed
during the course of ten years of war in Iraq.
I think one of the other things that is striking about abortion's reality -- where are the orphans? Orphanages are few and far between these days. Waiting lists for adoption are long. This was not always the case.
ReplyDelete"Prior to 1973, 20 percent of births to white, unmarried women (and 9 percent of unwed births over all) led to an adoption. Today, just 1 percent of babies born to unwed mothers are adopted . . ."
Today "one in five pregnancies ends at the abortion clinic." Those numbers seem to add up pretty well (although the second takes all races into account).
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/opinion/03douthat.html?_r=3&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha212&