If I told you that this Sunday there was going to be a
group of people sitting together at the front of church wearing white gowns,
what would be your guess in identifying them?
Most likely you would guess that they were confirmands and that it was
Confirmation Sunday. In the present
setting of the Lutheran Church your guess would almost certainly be
correct. At the same time, that correct
identification says a great deal about the piety and life of our Church today.
If you had asked that question of someone in North Africa
or Italy in the fourth or fifth century A.D., the answer would have been quite
different. They would have correctly
guessed that those in white gowns were the Christians who had just been
baptized at the Vigil of Easter. As they
came up from the water of the baptismal font (something that was deep enough
for them to enter the water up to their waist) they were clothed with a white
gown. This gown was meant to recall the
apostle Paul’s words to the Galatians: “For as many of you as were baptized
into Christ have put on Christ” (3:27).
The newly baptized Christians wore their white gowns and sat together in
services during the first week of Easter (the octave).
We see a remnant of this practice in the white chrism
gown that is placed on a baby after he or she is baptized. While the directions in the Lutheran
Service Book Agenda simply say, “The pastor may place a white garment on the
newly baptized,” we tend to assume that this only true of infants. I don’t believe that I have ever seen an
adult baptism in the Lutheran Church where the individual was clothed with a
white gown after baptism. I dare say
that people would find this very odd. They
would probably say that it wasn’t “Lutheran.”
They might even call it “Baptist” since in that tradition individuals are known to wear white gowns for their baptism by immersion.
We don’t clothe non-infants in white gowns at Holy
Baptism. We do clothe non-infants in
white gowns at Confirmation. We surround Confirmation in ceremonial that we are
unwilling to apply to Holy Baptism. Now
I certainly wouldn’t go so far as to say that we act like we think Confirmation
is more important than Baptism. But if I
didn’t know better based on what we claim to confess, I might wonder. Which one is treated as a bigger event, a
baptism or a confirmation? It is common
for Lutherans to have Confirmation parties or receptions to which friends,
family and congregation members are invited. When was the last time you
attended a similar Baptism party or reception?
This is surprising because, of course, theologically
Confirmation is nothing. It
wasn’t instituted by Christ. He didn’t
command His Church to do it. It has no
divine promise of forgiveness or any other blessing. To be sure, we can think
up good things that can be associated with it.
It is an occasion to acknowledge and give thanks that the Lord’s mandate
of making disciples by baptizing and teaching has been carried out. It is an opportunity for young people to
confess the faith (though are we saying that somehow this is more “real” or
important than when they confessed the Nicene Creed the previous Sunday?). It is an occasion to pray for God’s blessing
upon them.
These are nice things.
But do they really merit the kind of focus that the Lutheran Church in
her piety today places upon Confirmation?
And there is another question that we need to ask as well. Do we really want to pile this much focus and
ceremonial upon a terminal event in catechesis? Confirmation is the final event that
concludes “Confirmation instruction” (catechesis). By definition, when you are confirmed you are
done being instructed. You are
finished. In most settings it is the
occasion when a young person receives the Sacrament of the Altar for the first
time. This too conveys the
impression that the youth is done being instructed. The goal has been reached and he or she is
done.
Gowns at Confirmation are not simply ceremonial that
conveys significance to the Rite of Confirmation. They also bear a powerful cultural
association: graduation. The
other times when people where gowns (usually of the same style) is graduation
from high school and college (and increasingly, middle school). If the goal is to send the message that
Confirmation means the youth is done with learning about the faith (or worse
yet, done having to spend time at church), having them wear gowns that resemble
graduation gowns is a good idea.
Naturally this is not what we are trying to
accomplish. And so this year the Rite of Confirmation at Good Shepherd will not
include the use of confirmation gowns.
For reasons described above, this is an intentional attempt to
de-emphasize Confirmation. Instead we
want to emphasize something that does have Christ’s institution, command
and promise: the Sacrament of the Altar.
We want to focus more attention on when children receive the Sacramentfor the first time as we make use of the Rite of First Communion prior to Confirmation. This is an event the
follows after catechesis, but also leads into further catechesis.
We do not want to do things that focus attention on a
terminal event in catechesis. We don’t want to send the message that a youth is
finished. We certainly don’t want to make use of something that has the
associations of graduation.
Most congregations make use of confirmation gowns. However, not all do. I have been interested to learn from other
pastors that they have already taken the step of discontinuing their use for
the reasons discussed here. Confirmation has had a long, and to be quite honest, a bizarre history in the Church. Something that today many consider to be an important
part of “Lutheran” life is in fact a practice that Luther and Lutherans
centered around Wittenberg did not use at all.
Many of the things that people today consider to be important parts of
Confirmation did not arise until the eighteenth century under the influence of Rationalism that proved so harmful to the Lutheran Church. There is a need to examine what our practice of
Confirmation has become, how it functions in our church and how this relates to
what we confess as Lutherans.
I look at the use of robes in a different way, by intentionally connecting confirmation with Holy Baptism, as the confirmands make public confirmation of the faith into which they are baptized and in which they have been catechized.
ReplyDeleteThat is certainly a valid interpretation. However, I don't believe it is one that is going to be shared by your congregation.
DeleteUnless of course you explicitly make that connection clear to your congregation. No reason the affirmation of baptism rite can't be a moment of ongoing catechesis.
DeleteI moved our confirmation date from May to October for the same reason- why have it at the same time as graduation ceremonies? It only reinforced the idea of confirmation as graduation - especially in my context where 8th grade students have a formal middle school graduation, as well as confirmation.
DeleteTo cheer you up: we don't use confirmation gowns, but we did have our first use of a baptismal gown with an adult baptism last October.
ReplyDeleteIn my dream world, we'd all wear white albs over our street clothes each time we engaged in worship.
ReplyDeleteOf course, then, we'd be probably be arrested on suspicion of being in a cult ;)
"...the Nicene Creed they confessed the previous Sunday..." How about the Apostles' Creed they confessed at their baptism?
ReplyDeleteConfirmation is a “confirmation” by the catechumen’s Pastor and Congregation that he has been trained for self-examination prior to admittance to the Lord’s Supper. It is not a confirmation that one was Baptized. That is why the reference to the Nicene Creed.
DeleteI have been to more baptism parties then not on the day of a baptism. More distressing has been the trend towards pricate family baptism services. It is not a private function, and the family is specifically the family of God. To exclude the family involved speaks volumes to whether they truely understand what is happening to their infant.
ReplyDelete