Friday, February 28, 2014
LIfe news: President of Planned Parenthood says that when life begins is "not relevant"
In our world, the conclusions of science are usually the determiner of truth. They provide the facts of life and everything else must bow before them. Yet when it comes to abortion, all of that goes out the window. The science is clear about when life begins. For this reason, supporters of abortion don't want to talk about the issue. It is therefore eye opening and staggering to hear Planned Parenthood Cecile Richards actually say that when life begins is not relevant to the discussion of abortion. She says that the life of her children began when she delivered them. One simply must watch this brief video and hear Richards uncomfortably seek to get around the issue.
Persecuted Church: Indonesian opposition to construction of Christian churches
Even in supposedly tolerant Muslim nations, Christians face harassment and threats of violence. In Indonesia they make the construction of a church a long and uncertain process.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Mark's thoughts: Getting a handle on the biblical "big picture"
This morning I had a great conversation about biblical eschatology with a pastor who is near the beginning of his service in the parish. He had a very good handle on many aspects of biblical eschatology, but didn't yet quite see how it all fits together. I pointed him to an article I had written entitled, "Good Stuff: The Material Creation and the Christian faith." I wrote it because it is the article I wish someone had put into my hands twenty years ago. It takes the key elements of creation, incarnation, sacraments, resurrection/renewed creation and sets them within a salvation historical framework - the "big picture" of how God works. If you haven't read it, take a look.
It have written a bible study based on the article's content and it is available online. It received a very positive response in the parish.
It have written a bible study based on the article's content and it is available online. It received a very positive response in the parish.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Mark's thoughts: Questions and no answers at the death of our baby
Recently a blog post by Rachel Lewis entitled Why miscarriage matters when you are pro-life has been making the rounds on
Facebook. In the post Lewis reflects on
the experience of miscarriage and raises some helpful questions regarding how
Christians think and speak about the life that is lost. She also speaks about actions that can
support the mother.
When I hear or read about miscarriage, it is difficult
not to think back to the most terrible sound that I have ever heard. Amy had given birth to our first child Timothy. A little over two years later she became
pregnant with our second child. There
were some initial concerns about the pregnancy, and then everything seemed to
be fine. Amy was well along into her
second trimester. She had that wonderful
look of a pregnant woman.
Then while we were at my brother’s house, Amy saw
troubling signs. My brother, a family practice doctor, helped us to make an
appointment at an ob/gyn practice and we went that day. The ultrasound was beginning and I knew
exactly what to expect as we were about to listen to the baby’s heart. Yet as the technician moved the instrument
around Amy’s pregnant belly there was instead, a deafening silence. There was no sound in the room except that of
the ultrasound machine itself. Between
the silence and the look on the ultrasound technician’s face the situation
became clear – our baby had died.
In the years since then, I have learned that miscarriages
are not at all uncommon. Many occur
earlier in pregnancy than our experience, but they are each the unexpected loss
of a baby. As I read Lewis’ piece, my
mind returned to a thought that has occupied it many times before when it comes
to the subject of miscarriage.
We in the Lutheran Church
really don’t talk about miscarriage.
Some of the reason for this is quite understandable. The circumstances of many miscarriages do not
leave a body to be buried. More often
than not it is not a public matter, but instead a very private one that few
people know about. While privacy may be
something that helps some people in the grieving process, at times I wonder if
this is really healthy. Miscarriage seems to be something that we often seek to
avoid discussing. In part we do this in the attempt to avoid further hurting
people who have experienced a terrible loss.
However, I think there is another reason why the Lutheran Church
herself finds miscarriage to be a particularly uncomfortable topic. After all, the Lutheran Church
holds three beliefs very strongly. The
first is that life begins at conception.
The second is that since the Fall, all people conceived in the normal
way of man are sinful, spiritually dead, and have the devil as their lord. The third is that through Holy Baptism the
Holy Spirit creates new spiritual life and gives the forgiveness of sins.
Because of these beliefs, in the absence of the opportunity to administer Holy
Baptism, we are left with no clear way to address the fact that this baby was
alive and also a fallen, sinful individual.
In the desire to provide comfort, Lutherans have drawn
upon cherished theological truths in order to find a way to address this
problem. The least plausible is the
assertion that because the mother received the body and blood of Christ in the
Sacrament of the Altar, the unborn baby also received the forgiveness it
provides. It strains the imagination to
believe that this fulfills what our Lord meant when he said about the bread
“take eat” and about the wine “drink of it all of you.” Beyond this it fails to take into account
what the Small Catechism says
about the need for faith in the words “Given and shed for you for the
forgiveness of sin.”
More plausible and more
frequently heard is the suggestion that God’s Word creates faith in infants in
the womb. Now no one doubts that with
God all things are possible, and as Lutherans we certainly embrace the power of
God’s Word to create faith. As those who
baptize infants, we also do not reduce faith solely to intellectual activity.
It is true that Paul writes, “So
faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17
ESV), but clearly the faith described here is one that believes in and calls
upon Christ (Romans 10:8-10, 14). In the
absence of any confession of faith, we have no means of certainty about forgiveness
and salvation. It is true that John the Baptist leapt in the womb in the
presence of Christ and Elizabeth
said: “For behold, when the sound of your greeting came to my ears, the baby in
my womb leaped for joy” (Luke 1:44 ESV).
But we are also told that Elizabeth
was able to say this because she “was filled with the Holy Spirit” (Luke 1:41
ESV). In principle it reveals that
infants can respond to God’s saving work, but absent direct revelation by the
Holy Spirit we have no way of knowing for sure.
The certainty of Holy Baptism
is in fact the very thing that is lost when a miscarriage occurs. The Gospel is about certainty. Where God gives forgiveness and salvation,
there is no doubt. His saving work is
certain and sure because it is his
work. How do we
know that the child is forgiven and saved?
He or she was baptized! That is
the very reason that during her history the Church
has permitted lay people to baptize in the face of life threatening
circumstances when there has been no priest or pastor present. The gift of Holy Baptism brings the certainty
of salvation and so circumstances cannot be allowed to prevent the
administration of baptism.
But what are we to say when it
is God who permitted the circumstances that prevented baptism? What are we to say when faithful Christian
parents never have a chance to bring their baby to Holy Baptism before
death? It is understandable that we want
to provide comforting answers. But as
Lutherans we know that we can only speak where Scripture speaks and that we
must be silent when Scripture is silent.
The history of Christian theology is littered with false teachings that
arose out of pious speculation – the attempt to provide answers where Scripture
was silent. When repeated long enough
and by teachers famous enough, this speculation becomes “true,” even though it
is not. This is “tradition” – the
handing down of things – at its worst and not its biblical best.
When we learned that our baby
had died, I contacted a good friend who teaches at the seminary that I had
attended and shared our loss. Naturally
he provided words of comfort and encouragement.
But in his reply the words that stood out were these: “The Lord gave, and
the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord” (Job 1:21 ESV). At the time, I was rather surprised by
this. It didn’t seem like the most
comforting text to share.
Yet the more I have thought
about it, the more I have realized that they were the perfect words. At the loss of his children, Job didn’t ask
questions. He didn’t seek answers. Instead, his words focused on the Lord. The Lord had given. The Lord had taken away. What else was there to do but bless the Lord,
because he is the Lord?
In the face of miscarriage our
questions will provide no answers – at least no Gospel answers, the kind that
have no uncertainty. Instead, we are
left only with the Lord. In this New
Testament era we know the Lord to be the One who in love suffered and died for
us on cross, and then rose from the dead.
This is the kind of Lord he has revealed himself to be for us and for
all people. And so long ago I realized
that there is only one thing to do with this baby we lost. I surrender my questions and my desire for
answers, and instead entrust him or her to the Lord. This little one rests in his hands. That is
all I need to know.
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
Culture news: Born this way? On the prohibition of sexual orientation change efforts to minors
Dr. Michelle Cretella, Vice-President of the American College of Pediatricians, makes some very helpful observations about homosexuality and the fact that some states are passing laws that prohibit access to sexual orientation change efforts to minors.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Culture news: The case against heterosexuality
Michael Hannon has written a substantial piece that considers the history of the concept "heterosexuality." He calls into question the ability of this concept to articulate a biblical understanding of sex. This is a thought provoking piece that raises many questions to ponder.
Commemoration of Martin Luther, Doctor and Reformer
Today we
remember and give thanks for Martin Luther, Doctor and Reformer. Martin Luther, born on November 10, 1483, in
Eisleben, Germany, initially began studies leading toward a degree in law.
However, after a close encounter with death, he switched to the study of
theology, entered an Augustinian monastery, was ordained a priest in
1505, and received a doctorate in theology in 1512. As a professor at the
newly-established University
of Wittenberg, his
scriptural studies led him to question many of the church's teachings and
practices, especially the selling of indulgences. His refusal to back
down from his convictions resulted in his excommunication in 1521. Following a
period of seclusion at the Wartburg castle, Luther returned to Wittenberg,
where he spent the rest of his life preaching and teaching, translating the
Scriptures, and writing hymns and numerous theological treatises. He is
remembered and honored for his lifelong emphasis on the biblical truth that for
Christ's sake God declares us righteous by grace through faith alone. He died
on February 18, 1546, while visiting the town of his birth.
Collect of the Day:
O God, our
refuge and our strength, You raised up Your servant Martin Luther to reform and
renew Your Church in the light of Your living Word, Jesus Christ, our
Lord. Defend and purify the Church in
our own day, and grant that we may boldly proclaim Christ’s faithfulness unto
death and His vindicating resurrection, which You made known to Your servant
Martin through Jesus Christ, our Savior, who lives and reigns with You and the
Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever.
Sunday, February 16, 2014
Sermon for Septuagesima
Septuagesima
1
Cor 9:24-10:5
2/16/14
On Tuesday this past week I turned
forty four. Forty four itself is no big
deal. It’s still closer to forty than it
is to fifty. Admittedly, turning forty was something that was far more
notable. There was a sense that when I
turned forty, I really couldn’t consider myself “young” anymore. I certainly wasn’t “old,” but at forty years
with a wife, four kids, two dogs and a job there was no doubt that I had
settled into full blown adulthood.
The fact that I was now certainly an
adult, and no longer a young man didn’t really bother me all that much. The factors I just mentioned are all good
things. Life married to Amy is way better
than being single. The kids are a great
blessing … even if they are also a lot of work.
I always wanted a dog. And my job
is far more than a job. I have a vocation that I love doing and a great place
to do it.
Instead, turning forty proved to be
a major downer for another reason. All
the years previously, I was able to eat as much as I wanted of whatever I
wanted. I could do this and nothing
changed. Between Thanksgiving and New
Year’s Day I would indulge in all of the wonderful holiday eating. I might gain a few pounds. But after New Year’s Day I returned to my
normal pattern of eating and everything went back to normal – anything I might
have gained just disappeared.
However, almost like clockwork, I
turned forty and everything changed. Once
I had turned forty, in the month after New Year’s Day I realized that the extra
weight wasn’t just disappearing like it always had in the past. The ugly
realization dawned on me that for the first time in my life, I was actually
going to have to start watch what I eat.
I was going to have to watch what I eat,
and I was going to have to exercise. In
the past I had run just to stay in shape and because it made me feel good. But
now, I actually needed to do it. And I
have to confess, recently I haven’t been very disciplined about that. I was running in the fall with the intention
that when the winter arrived I would run on our treadmill on days when it was
too cold to run outside. However I got
sick with a cold. I stopped running …
and never started back up again. And so
when it warms up, I am determined to get going again. And once I get going, I will be disciplined
and stay with it.
In our text this morning St. Paul
talks about the discipline needed in running.
He does this in order to teach about the Christian life – about the need
to be disciplined in the face of a sinful world. During these three Sundays of
Pre-Lent, we are making the transition into the season of Lent. There we will focus on repentance and the
struggle against sin. This morning, our
text helps us to begin to think about this.
Our Epistle lesson this morning
drops us right into the middle of a discussion that covers chapters eight
through ten in First Corinthians. Paul
is addressing a situation that was part of the ancient Greco-Roman world. Most likely, you assume that every day you
are going to eat meat in at least one of your meals. If you want meat you go to
the grocery store and there you can find a basically unlimited supply. Or you
can just go to any fast food place or restaurant.
Things were very different in
the first century world. There, people
ate very little meat. It was expensive
and it wasn’t available everywhere when you lived in a urban setting like
Corinth. If you wanted meat – and
everyone needed to eat some – there was one regular source. There was a regular
supply of meat produced by the sacrificing of animals at pagan temples. The animal’s throat was slit, the blood
sprayed on the altar, and then it was also caught in a vessel to be poured on
the altar. Then the dead animal was
prepared. The bones and fat were burned
on the altar as an offering to the god or goddess, while the meat went to the
priest and the person making the sacrifice.
Now we are talking about hundreds of
animals being slaughtered at multiple temples each day. This produced a surplus of meat. Some was eaten on the temple grounds, in
areas that were set aside for this purpose.
The rest was sold in the market place.
The problem was that some Christians
at Corinth were going to the temples in order to eat. They weren’t sacrificing to the false gods. But they were eating in a religious setting
directly connected to paganism. They
were doing this because they thought they had everything figured out and that
they had it made. From Paul’s letter we learn that they said things like, “All
of us possess knowledge.” This knowledge was the fact that “an idol has no real
existence,” and “there is no God but one.” These Christians said that since
they knew the true God and knew that pagan gods were false gods, they were free
to eat at the temples. They could do so
because they had this knowledge. And in
addition, they were baptized Christians who received the Sacrament of the
Altar. They were protected. What could a false god do to them?
In addressing this problem, Paul
uses two different approaches. The first
is to emphasize that the Corinthian Christian needed to think about how this
action would impact other Christians. Some would not understand things in this
way. They too would eat at pagan temples, but for them this would be a return
to paganism. Paul objects: “And so by
your knowledge this weak person is destroyed, the brother for whom Christ died.
Thus, sinning against your brothers and wounding their conscience when it is
weak, you sin against Christ. Therefore, if food makes my brother stumble, I
will never eat meat, lest I make my brother stumble.” Paul says that Christians
need to put the welfare of others before themselves.
Paul’s second point is that while
pagan gods are not the true God, that doesn’t mean that there is nothing
present in paganism. Instead, there are
demonic forces at work – and Christians are not to have anything to do with
them. What’s more the mere reception of
baptism and the Lord’s Supper was not some kind of magic protection for those
who chose to be involved with these things.
In our text Paul uses the children
of Israel in the Old Testament as an example of how mere possession of God’s
gifts did not protect those who willingly disobeyed Yahweh. He says, “For I do not want you to be
unaware, brothers, that our fathers were all under the cloud, and all passed
through the sea, and all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea,
and all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink.” But then he immediately adds, “Nevertheless,
with most of them God was not pleased, for they were overthrown in the
wilderness.” Israelite involvement with
paganism and its accompanying immorality had lead to their destruction. The same thing would happen to the
Corinthians if they kept frequenting the temple of pagan gods.
Paul’s point in the midst of all
this is that as we live in a sinful world, Christians can’t just do whatever
they want. There are real threats out there and we need to be disciplined as we
face them. In our text Paul uses the
metaphor of running and athletics in order to explain this. This would have
been very natural for Corinthians since Corinth hosted the Isthmian Games –
athletic contests that were part of a series of games in Greece that included
the Olympic Games. He writes: “Do you
not know that in a race all the runners run, but only one receives the prize?
So run that you may obtain it. Every athlete exercises self-control in all
things. They do it to receive a perishable wreath, but we an imperishable. So I
do not run aimlessly; I do not box as one beating the air. But I discipline my
body and keep it under control, lest after preaching to others I myself should
be disqualified.”
So the obvious question raised by
our text is this: How’s your running going?
Are you living in a way that sees sin for what it is and seeks to avoid
it? Do you live as someone who
recognizes that the devil is always on the prowl, seeking to work every angle
in our culture to separate you from Christ? In the music you listen to, the
things you watch, the things you read are you choosing to immerse yourself in a
worldview opposed to God?
Earlier in this letter Paul reminded
the Corinthians about what they had been and what God had made them to be. He did this so that they would now live as
what God had made them. He wrote, “Or do
you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not
be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor
men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor
revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of
you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name
of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”
Like the Corinthians, you were
washed, sanctified and justified in your baptism. Those same things are true whenever after
stumbling you return in repentance and faith to God’s promise about what he did
in your baptism. This same forgiveness
is present when your hear Holy Absolution and when you believe in the Gospel –
the fact that Jesus Christ died on the cross and rose from the dead in order to
take away your sins.
You live as people who each week in
the Sacrament of the Altar eat and drink the body and blood of Jesus Christ,
given and shed for you on the cross.
Shortly after our text, Paul goes on to say in questions that assume a
positive answer: “The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a participation
in the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a participation in
the body of Christ?” Through this food each
week Christ nourishes the new man in you.
Through his Word and his Sacrament
our Lord feeds you so that you are able to run, and to run well. This running does require discipline as you
seek to avoid sin and to live in ways that show faith toward God and love
towards your neighbor. Yet you run
knowing that it is the Lord through his Spirit who gives you strength. It is he who sustains you so that you can
press on in the faith and take hold of the imperishable wreath of resurrection
and eternal life.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)