Today I did an interview with Todd Wilken on Issues, Etc. about whether the Church finds herself in the same culture as the first century A.D. While there are many significant similarities between today and the first century, one of the biggest differences exists in what some parts of the Church have become.
Thursday, April 30, 2015
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Mark's thoughts: No gowns at Confirmation this year
If I told you that this Sunday there was going to be a
group of people sitting together at the front of church wearing white gowns,
what would be your guess in identifying them?
Most likely you would guess that they were confirmands and that it was
Confirmation Sunday. In the present
setting of the Lutheran Church your guess would almost certainly be
correct. At the same time, that correct
identification says a great deal about the piety and life of our Church today.
If you had asked that question of someone in North Africa
or Italy in the fourth or fifth century A.D., the answer would have been quite
different. They would have correctly
guessed that those in white gowns were the Christians who had just been
baptized at the Vigil of Easter. As they
came up from the water of the baptismal font (something that was deep enough
for them to enter the water up to their waist) they were clothed with a white
gown. This gown was meant to recall the
apostle Paul’s words to the Galatians: “For as many of you as were baptized
into Christ have put on Christ” (3:27).
The newly baptized Christians wore their white gowns and sat together in
services during the first week of Easter (the octave).
We see a remnant of this practice in the white chrism
gown that is placed on a baby after he or she is baptized. While the directions in the Lutheran
Service Book Agenda simply say, “The pastor may place a white garment on the
newly baptized,” we tend to assume that this only true of infants. I don’t believe that I have ever seen an
adult baptism in the Lutheran Church where the individual was clothed with a
white gown after baptism. I dare say
that people would find this very odd. They
would probably say that it wasn’t “Lutheran.”
They might even call it “Baptist” since in that tradition individuals are known to wear white gowns for their baptism by immersion.
We don’t clothe non-infants in white gowns at Holy
Baptism. We do clothe non-infants in
white gowns at Confirmation. We surround Confirmation in ceremonial that we are
unwilling to apply to Holy Baptism. Now
I certainly wouldn’t go so far as to say that we act like we think Confirmation
is more important than Baptism. But if I
didn’t know better based on what we claim to confess, I might wonder. Which one is treated as a bigger event, a
baptism or a confirmation? It is common
for Lutherans to have Confirmation parties or receptions to which friends,
family and congregation members are invited. When was the last time you
attended a similar Baptism party or reception?
This is surprising because, of course, theologically
Confirmation is nothing. It
wasn’t instituted by Christ. He didn’t
command His Church to do it. It has no
divine promise of forgiveness or any other blessing. To be sure, we can think
up good things that can be associated with it.
It is an occasion to acknowledge and give thanks that the Lord’s mandate
of making disciples by baptizing and teaching has been carried out. It is an opportunity for young people to
confess the faith (though are we saying that somehow this is more “real” or
important than when they confessed the Nicene Creed the previous Sunday?). It is an occasion to pray for God’s blessing
upon them.
These are nice things.
But do they really merit the kind of focus that the Lutheran Church in
her piety today places upon Confirmation?
And there is another question that we need to ask as well. Do we really want to pile this much focus and
ceremonial upon a terminal event in catechesis? Confirmation is the final event that
concludes “Confirmation instruction” (catechesis). By definition, when you are confirmed you are
done being instructed. You are
finished. In most settings it is the
occasion when a young person receives the Sacrament of the Altar for the first
time. This too conveys the
impression that the youth is done being instructed. The goal has been reached and he or she is
done.
Gowns at Confirmation are not simply ceremonial that
conveys significance to the Rite of Confirmation. They also bear a powerful cultural
association: graduation. The
other times when people where gowns (usually of the same style) is graduation
from high school and college (and increasingly, middle school). If the goal is to send the message that
Confirmation means the youth is done with learning about the faith (or worse
yet, done having to spend time at church), having them wear gowns that resemble
graduation gowns is a good idea.
Naturally this is not what we are trying to
accomplish. And so this year the Rite of Confirmation at Good Shepherd will not
include the use of confirmation gowns.
For reasons described above, this is an intentional attempt to
de-emphasize Confirmation. Instead we
want to emphasize something that does have Christ’s institution, command
and promise: the Sacrament of the Altar.
We want to focus more attention on when children receive the Sacramentfor the first time as we make use of the Rite of First Communion prior to Confirmation. This is an event the
follows after catechesis, but also leads into further catechesis.
We do not want to do things that focus attention on a
terminal event in catechesis. We don’t want to send the message that a youth is
finished. We certainly don’t want to make use of something that has the
associations of graduation.
Most congregations make use of confirmation gowns. However, not all do. I have been interested to learn from other
pastors that they have already taken the step of discontinuing their use for
the reasons discussed here. Confirmation has had a long, and to be quite honest, a bizarre history in the Church. Something that today many consider to be an important
part of “Lutheran” life is in fact a practice that Luther and Lutherans
centered around Wittenberg did not use at all.
Many of the things that people today consider to be important parts of
Confirmation did not arise until the eighteenth century under the influence of Rationalism that proved so harmful to the Lutheran Church. There is a need to examine what our practice of
Confirmation has become, how it functions in our church and how this relates to
what we confess as Lutherans.
Monday, April 27, 2015
Mark's thoughts: No, it's not the first centuries all over again for the Church
At the beginning of the
twenty-first century the Church
finds herself living in a post-Christian world.
When we look around, the parallels with the world in which the Church of the first centuries lived are
striking. Once again the Church of the west lives in a world of religious
pluralism and syncretism, and practicing Christians find themselves in the
minority. The sexual ethics of today have completely reversed the dramatic transformation that Christianity had worked upon the Greco-Roman world and have
returned accepted behavior to the sexual free for all of the first centuries
(though no one in the first centuries was so foolish as to believe that two
people of the same sex could be married).
It is important to recognize
these similarities and to understand that the culture addressed by the New
Testament stands closer to our own than at any time in 1500 years. As Christians survey the cultural scene they
often take comfort in the thought, “Well, the Church
has faced this before.” However while
there is truth to this, there is also another reality that cannot escape our
attention.
The sad fact is that the Church is not the same as she was in the first three
centuries. The Church
of that time believed in the authority of Scriptures as God’s revelation. She believed that doctrine grounded in
Scripture was a key component in her life.
As one Body she rejected the world’s sexual ethics and instead spoke the
truth of God’s design for his creation.
The Enlightenment of the
1700’s with its emphasis on the priority of reason has changed all of
this. It began an intellectual
trajectory that has prompted large portions of what is now called the Church to reject the authority of God’s Word, and
therefore to dismiss notions of truth and error in doctrine. Where this has occurred, this same group has
been carried along with the culture and has accepted the sexual ethics of
today. Homosexuality, ordained
homosexuals and now same sex marriage have become accepted parts of life.
Christians who are orthodox
in belief will dismiss such abdication to the world. Yet the difference from the Church’s situation in the first centuries is
important. The Church
of the first centuries stood in opposition to the world. Now, large portions of that which calls
itself Church stand with the
world. The world certainly notices this
and it weakens the Church’s witness
to the world. An excellent example of
this can be found in William N. Eskridge Jr.’s piece in the Sunday New York Times in which he argues that it’s not gay marriage vs. the Church anymore.
The presence of Christians who accept homosexuality and same sex
marriage provides proof that these things are true and that all Christians
should accept them.
Again, it is easy for
orthodox Christians to dismiss this argument. But existence of this “alternative Church” presents a threat to the Church. In addition
to weakening the witness of the Church
to the world, it also threatens the future life of the Church.
Those being raised in the Church face powerful cultural forces that seek to
draw them away. Simultaneously they see an alternative way of being “Church” – one that does not require struggle against
the world. This a challenge that the Church
of the first centuries did not face.
The Church
is the Lord’s Church and so she will
be sustained according to his will. At the same time, we need to be clear
minded about what we face as we seek to be faithful in this time and place. The existence of a “Church”
that has become part of the world is a new threat that did not confront the Church of the first centuries.
Sunday, April 26, 2015
Sermon for Fourth Sunday of Easter - Jubliate Jn 16:16-22
Easter 4
Jn
16:16-22
4/26/15
I am very glad that the birth of our
three youngest children did not take place like that of our first one. Timothy was our first child and with no
health concerns about mother or baby the plan was always for Amy to give birth
without any surgery.
As Amy approached her due date she
showed no signs of going into labor and her blood pressure started to
rise. The decision was made to induce
labor. But as I have described on another occasion, two attempts at inducement
failed. The third time finally worked – but that is not to say things happened
quickly. Timothy’s birth was a long
ordeal that took several days. It was an
unsettling experience that left no question in my mind about how mothers and
babies often died in childbirth during earlier periods of history.
When Amy was pregnant with the
twins, the experience with Timothy’s birth was still fresh in my mind. I found the thought of doing that twice
rather scary. I was therefore relieved
when it turned out that one of the babies was turned the wrong way, and the
decision was made to deliver them via c section. Amy and I were going to enjoy
Memorial Day, with the delivery scheduled for the following day. However that morning her water broke and so
she delivered a day early. The
experience of the c section was seemed much less stressful. It was only after the fact that I learned
that the doctor rapidly delivered Abigail after Matthew because the placenta
had been cut. Their birth certificates say they were born a minute apart – it
was really more like ten seconds.
Because of the c section with the
twins it was a foregone conclusion that Michael would be delivered that way as well. And in his case everything went as
planned. This means that only in the
birth of one out of our four children, did Amy fully experience what Jesus
describes in our text today. Our Lord
uses the example of a woman going through the travail of labor in order to talk
about the sorrow the Church experiences right now as we wait for Jesus’
return. He acknowledges the difficulty
of the present, but contrasts this with the joy that will be ours when he returns.
Our Gospel lesson is part of Jesus’
“Farewell Discourse” that takes up chapters fourteen through seventeen. Jesus begins to prepare his disciples for the
fact that he is going to depart from them. They are not always going to have him
present in the manner that they have experienced during the previous three
years.
In chapter fourteen Jesus said, “Peace
I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I give to
you. Let not your hearts be troubled, neither let them be afraid. You heard me
say to you, ‘I am going away, and I will come to you.’” Our Lord says clearly that he is going
away. He assures them of his peace, but
just before our text he acknowledges that this news does not leave them feeling
peaceful. He says, “But now I am going
to him who sent me, and none of you asks me, ‘Where are you going?’ But because
I have said these things to you, sorrow has filled your heart.”
The departure of Jesus is not what
the disciples want. And Jesus tells them
– and us – what it is going to be like while he is gone. He says in chapter fifteen, “If the world
hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you. If you were of the
world, the world would love you as its own; but because you are not of the
world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.
Remember the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his
master.’ If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you.”
Jesus says that his disciples must
expect that the world will hate them.
After all, that is how the world reacted to Jesus. In fact the world is so twisted by sin that
those of the world will think they are serving God when they seek to kill
Christians. Our Lord says at the
beginning of this chapter, “I have said all these things to you to keep you
from falling away. They will put you out of the synagogues. Indeed, the hour is
coming when whoever kills you will think he is offering service to God. And
they will do these things because they have not known the Father, nor me. But I
have said these things to you, that when their hour comes you may remember that
I told them to you.”
It is impossible to listen to these
words and not think of what happened this past week as Muslims in Libya
executed thirty Christians from Ethiopia.
Across the Middle East and Africa we see Muslims who think they are
serving God when they kill those who worship Jesus Christ, just as Jesus said
would happen.
I am thankful that in our country we
do not face such direct threats to our lives.
But the pressure of our culture to think, speak and act in ways that
reject God’s will grows by the day. The
reality is we are very good at rationalizing why we watch that show or listen
to that music or act in that way or remain silent in that situation. We are very good at justifying ourselves in
our own mind. But the truth is that all
too often we are just lame. We would rather take the easy way and avoid
discomfort of suffering with Jesus. We
are too busy entertaining ourselves to death, to bother dying with Jesus.
This is something that we have to
confront. We need to confess those ways
that we take up the world’s side. We need to confess all of the ways we try to
justify our actions. We need to confess
all of the ways that we deny Jesus Christ is our Lord and instead make the
devil our Lord.
At the end of this chapter Jesus
says, “I have said these things to you, that in me you may have peace. In the
world you will have tribulation. But take heart; I have overcome the world.”
Jesus reminds us that in him we have peace.
We have peace because Jesus Christ is the risen Lord who forgives our
sins.
Two weeks ago we heard in the Gospel
lesson about how on that first Easter evening Jesus appeared in the midst of
the disciples and twice said, “Peace be with you.” When he had said this, he
showed them his hands and his side. He
showed them the marks left by his death on the cross through which he took away
the sins of the world. And then he breathed on them and said, “Receive the Holy
Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold
forgiveness from any, it is withheld.”
Jesus showed that we have peace
because he has risen from the dead and defeated death. He showed that we have peace because in Holy
Absolution he applies his cross to us and takes away our sins – he forgives us.
Now Jesus has departed in his
ascension which we will celebrate in a little under two weeks. This is not how we want things to be done.
But in this chapter, Jesus says that we are wrong. He says, “But now I am going to him who sent
me, and none of you asks me, ‘Where are you going?’ But because I have said
these things to you, sorrow has filled your heart. Nevertheless, I tell you the
truth: it is to your advantage that I go away, for if I do not go away,
the Helper will not come to you. But if I go, I will send him to you.”
In the mystery God’s working, the
departure of the Son enables the sending of the Spirit. It is the Spirit of Jesus who creates faith
and applies what Jesus had done for us.
It is the Spirit who gave us the apostles’ writings. Jesus said to the apostles, “But the Helper,
the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all
things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you.” It is the Spirit who reveals Jesus as our
Savior. Jesus said, “But when the Helper
comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who
proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me.”
It is the Spirit who gave you new
life as you were born again in the water of Holy Baptism. The Spirit called you to faith in Jesus
Christ and sustains you in that faith. And
indeed, the words of our text inspired by the Spirit give us encouragement for
the present and hope for the future.
In our text Jesus says to the
disciples: “Is this what you are asking yourselves, what I meant by saying, ‘A
little while and you will not see me, and again a little while and you will see
me’? Truly, truly, I say to you, you will weep and lament, but the world will
rejoice. You will be sorrowful, but your sorrow will turn into joy. When a
woman is giving birth, she has sorrow because her hour has come, but when she
has delivered the baby, she no longer remembers the anguish, for joy that a
human being has been born into the world. So also you have sorrow now, but I
will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take your joy
from you.”
Jesus says that for now we weep and
lament, while the world rejoices. We see what sin does to people and we mourn.
The world looks at the sin and rejoices – even calling it “good.” But Jesus says that this will not last
forever, and that when he returns in glory and brings the final deliverance it
will cause us to forget all the grief.
Our Lord compares this experience to
a pregnant woman who gives birth. In the
ancient world there was no anesthetic.
There was no epidural. A woman
experienced the full force of the pain of labor as she gave birth to a child. Jesus
says, “When a woman is giving birth, she has sorrow because her hour has come,
but when she has delivered the baby, she no longer remembers the anguish, for
joy that a human being has been born into the world.”
The woman giving birth has pain and
sorrow. Yet when she holds that new born
baby there is the joy of having brought a life into the world. Jesus says, “So also you have sorrow now, but
I will see you again, and your hearts will rejoice, and no one will take your
joy from you.”
Jesus fully acknowledges the sorrow
that is present for us now as we live in this world. But as the risen Lord who
has defeated sin, death and the devil he declares that the last word belongs
to him. He will return and when that
happens our hearts will rejoice and no one will take our joy from us.
Friday, April 24, 2015
Culture news: What will same sex marriage bring? Look at Canada
It seems likely that same sex marriage will be coming to every state in the U.S. The reaction to the Indiana' religious freedom law has provided a glimpse of the future. It's not hard to get a better picture of what that future will look like. Same sex marriage has been federally mandated in Canada for ten years and Dawn Stefanowicz describes what this has come to mean for citizens there.
Commemoration of Johann Walter, Kantor
"Christ lag in Todesbanden" in Walters Chorgesangbüchlein (1524)
Today we remember and give
thanks for Johann Walter, Kantor. Johann Walter (1496-1570) began service at
the age of 21 as a composer and bass singer in the court chapel of Frederick
the Wise. In 1524, he published a collection of hymns arranged according to the
church year. It was well received and served as the model for numerous
subsequent hymnals. In addition to serving for 30 years as kantor (church
musician) in the cities of Torgau and Dresden,
he also assisted Martin Luther in the preparation of the Deutsche Messe
(1526). Walter is remembered as the first Lutheran kantor and composer of
church music.
Collect of
the Day:
O Lord God,
through the life, death, and resurrection of Your Son, Jesus Christ, and by the
power of the Holy Spirit, the revelation of Your salvation mystery is now
revealed and made known to all the nations. Grant that this mystery of
salvation, as confessed by Johann and all those who now rest from their labors,
continue to guide Your Church on earth as we wait for the day when You come
from heaven one last time and usher in the new creation; through Jesus Christ, our Lord, who lives and reigns with
You and the Holy Spirit, one God, now and forever.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)