This year there
has been an intense national focus on immigration and what should be done about
illegal aliens who are now living in the United States. Therefore it’s not
surprising that in the days leading up to Christmas there have been a number of
individuals who have tried to drag Mary and Joseph into the discussion by
comparing their experience to these modern situations. However, any attempt to
do so reflects a lack of understanding about the historical setting in which
they lived. These same historical facts
help us to understand how God was at work in the birth of Jesus Christ.
When
Mary and Joseph travelled from Nazareth to Bethlehem, they never left one
country and entered into another. They were, in fact, within the kingdom of
Herod the Great the entire time. The Romans under Pompey had conquered this
area in 63 B.C. However, their typical practice on the eastern end of the
empire during this period was not to take direct control over lands. Instead,
they established client states that served as a buffer zone that separated the
Romans from the Parthian empire`.
These
client states were ruled by petty kings, and Herod the Great was one of these
kings. Herod ruled a kingdom that rivaled the one over which David had been
king. In an impressive display of being a survivor, Herod had managed to
ingratiate himself to whichever Roman leader happened to be controlling
Palestine at that time. Herod ran the affairs of his kingdom and had his own
army, but there was no doubt about who controlled him. He answered to the Roman
emperor.
As Luke
2:1 indicates, at the time when Jesus was born, that man was Augustus. For more than fifty years, the Roman Empire
had been racked by wars as leaders vied for control. Augustus had come out on
top, and he took actions which transformed the Roman Empire into something that
was truly ruled by one man – by him.
Luke
states, “In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus that
all the world should be registered” (2:1). Augustus ordered a census, and
normally a census led directly into Roman taxation. The available evidence indicates that usually
a census was done for lands that were under direct Roman rule and therefore
under direct Roman taxation. But in this case, it apparently also included
lands that were under their indirect control – a land like the kingdom of Herod
the Great.
This
probably helps to explain what Luke describes: “And all went to be registered,
each to his own town. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, from the town
of Nazareth, to Judea, to the city of David, which is
called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and lineage of David” (2:3-4). Typically, a Roman census was done according
to where a person lived. But there apparently could be some accommodation to
local settings (as seen in Egyptian papyri), and so in the Jewish land of Herod
it was done on the basis of family lineage.
Joseph
and the pregnant Mary had not travelled to Bethlehem for the purpose of living
there. They weren’t “immigrants.” There
was certainly nothing illegal about their activity. In fact, quite the
opposite, the only reason they were in Bethlehem was because they were obeying
what the government had told them to do.
There
was no doubt that the timing of the decree was terrible for this young couple.
We learn in our that Mary was pregnant (2:5), and it turns out that when they
made the trip she was close to giving birth. When they arrived in Bethlehem
they didn’t find the normal accommodations. They probably expected to stay in
an extra room at the home of extended family. The ESV provides the translation:
“And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in swaddling
cloths and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them
in the inn” (2:7). The Greek word translated as “inn” (ἐν τῷ καταλύματι.) doesn’t mean a place where travelers rent a room. There is a different word for
that, and Luke uses it in the Parable of the Good Samaritan (εἰς πανδοχεῖον ;10:34).
Instead,
the word used refers to an extra room in a house that is available for use. It
is the same word used by Luke in 22:11 to describe the room where Jesus celebrated
the Last Supper with his disciples (ποῦ ἐστιν τὸ κατάλυμα ὅπου τὸ πάσχα μετὰ τῶν
μαθητῶν μου φάγω;). The influx of people for the census probably meant they
weren’t the only extended family who showed up looking for housing. When Mary
and Joseph arrived, there was no more room in the house, and so they were given
the next best thing available – a stable where animals were kept. The setting of Jesus’ birth did not indicate
that Mary and Joseph were rejected or mistreated.
Rather
than trying to use Marry and Joseph to comment on modern issues, we should see
in their situation how God carried out his plan of salvation and fulfilled his
word.. Mary and Joseph were in Bethlehem because of forces over which they had
no control. An emperor had issued a decree.
A king was obeying by implementing it. They had to obey. But what we now
know, is that the emperor was subject to the One who controls all things. St. Paul told the Galatians, “But when
the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son” (Galatians 4:4).
God
acted at the right moment according to his plan. He, the Creator of all things,
had used empires in the past as the tools by which he carried out his purposes.
He had used the Assyrians, the Babylonians, and the Persians. He had used
Sennacherib, Nebuchadnezzar, and Cyrus. Now he was using the Romans and
Augustus. He used them to cause Mary and Joseph to be in Bethlehem at the time
when Mary gave birth to Jesus.
Emperor
Augustus was God’s instrument through whom he brought Mary and Joseph to
Bethlehem at the time when Mary was to give birth to Jesus the Christ – the
Messiah. He had done so because this fulfilled his word that he had spoken
through the prophet Micah: “But you, O Bethlehem Ephrathah, who are too little
to be among the clans of Judah, from you shall come forth for me one who
is to be ruler in Israel, whose coming forth is from of old,
from ancient days” (Micah 5:2; Matthew 2:3-6).

No comments:
Post a Comment