In a few moments, we are invited to approach the Lord’s altar with the same faith. We go to receive a sip of wine and a crumb – a bite of dry bread. Yet we go because of who Jesus is and what he has promised about it. We go in faith because we know that there we receive the true body and blood of the risen Lord. And through this body and blood given and shed for you, Jesus Christ gives you forgiveness and strength to continue in faith. Through this divine food the Holy Spirit feeds and nourishes the new man within you so that you can walk in faith. Crumbs from the table? It may not look like all that much. But the Canaanite woman in our text is right. Because they are crumbs from this Lord they provide everything that we need.
This is the last paragraph of the sermon
that I preached on Matthew 15:21-28, the Gospel lesson for the Second Sunday in
Lent – Reminiscere, which deals with Jesus and the Canaanite woman. It is rather typical of the kind of
homiletical move that occurs in my sermons on a regular basis when the text
includes elements such as bread, food, eating, Christ’s touch in healing, and
God’s presence with his people. I find
that such elements naturally invite references to the Sacrament of the Altar
and the manner in which Christ is present in his true body and blood, giving
forgiveness and sustaining us in the faith. These homiletical techniques find
their place alongside more direct references to the Sacrament in sermons which point
to this gift as a central and key means by which we receive forgiveness and live
our life as Christians.
What is striking to me is how very
different this is from the preaching that I heard when growing up in the
Lutheran Church. During those years I
heard what I would consider to be very solid, typical Lutheran preaching. Yet I do not remember in this preaching any
kind of consistent reference to the Sacrament of the Altar. The Sixth Part of the Small Catechism
was taught in Confirmation class. A
staunch defense of “the real presence” would always be offered. This was certainly held up as an essential
part of being “Lutheran.” Yet there was
very rarely any connection between the Sacrament and preaching. We learned the “right” things about the
Sacrament. We celebrated the Sacrament
every other Sunday using the liturgy of The Lutheran Hymnal and then Lutheran
Worship. Yet beyond these basic
factors, the Sacrament of the Altar was largely absent from the piety formed in
the congregation. My impression is that
what I experienced was rather typical.
It was of a piece with “non-communion Sundays,” a liturgy that was done
but never explained, and a liturgy done in a very minimalist and perfunctory
manner.
Where the Sacrament of the Altar has
ceased to hold a central position in the piety of a congregation, the step that
abandons the liturgy is a very small one, even though it is giant in its
implications. Certainly, the liturgy is
made up of verses and phrases taken from Holy Scripture. Yet just as important is the fact that the
liturgy has been built around the reading and proclamation of God’s Word
and the celebration of the Sacrament of the Altar. It highlights and emphasizes the
sacramental ways in which God comes to us and is therefore the best and most
natural setting for these gifts. Remove
the Sacrament of the Altar from the Divine Service and all that has been built around
it in order to extol the gift such as the Preface, Proper Preface, Sanctus and
Agnus Dei collapses.
Where the Sacrament is not celebrated every other Sunday, people are being taught that the worship life of
the Church does not need it. It is
non-essential – it can appear and disappear.
In such a setting, it is only natural that preaching does not emphasize the
Sacrament of the Altar. After all when
the Sacrament is absent half of the time, a reference to the Sacrament on a
Sunday when the Sacrament is not being celebrated is jarring. In many settings
(such as the one in which I grew up) this is every Sunday for the pastor
whose congregation alternates celebration of the Sacrament between early and
late services.
It was at the seminary that I
discovered that there is another way of doing things. I learned that purely from a matter of
practice, it had not been this way in the history of the catholic Church as a
whole, and Lutheran Church in particular.
Instead, a Sunday Divine Service without the Sacrament of the Altar was
unheard of until the influence of rationalism impacted the Lutheran Church
during the eighteenth century. I learned that the Lutheran Confessions talk
about the Sacrament of the Altar and what it means for the Church, even when
the topic is not the Sacrament of the Altar. I learned that Luther wrote about the
Sacrament of the Altar in deeply meaningful terms, even when the topic was
not the Sacrament of the Altar.
This is a piety that not only
confesses the truth about the gift, but also places it in a central position in
life of the Church. Because this is so, and
in making it so, the Sacrament of the Altar is celebrated every
Sunday. The Sacrament is the jewel in
the setting of the liturgy – a setting that focuses attention on the gift and
extols it at every turn. The liturgy is
celebrated in a rich and full way, because to do so is to enable the liturgy to
do this in the greatest way possible.
And preaching cannot help but mention the Sacrament of the Altar because
to speak about the Sacrament is to speak about Jesus Christ present every week
with his Church, giving forgiveness and strength for life in the faith.
"a liturgy that was done but never explained"
ReplyDeletethis is why only seminary students(past and present) understand or appreciate the liturgy. Everyone else can set their watch by what they hear in the liturgy and mentally sleep through the whole service.
Jim, I cannot agree with your statement. Where pastors take the time to teach about the liturgy, the congregation appreciates it more deeply. That has been my experience as a parish pastor.
Delete